Option to disable S/MIME signature check?
Kevin J. McCarthy
kevin at 8t8.us
Sun Jul 30 11:51:53 UTC 2023
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 02:48:56PM +0200, ilf wrote:
>I have also never used "spam" before. I wonder if this feature is
>really correct for my use-case, which has nothing to do with spam. It
>might do the job, but it doesn't feel clean.
It _is_ a "creative" use of the spam command. I think if you read about
the command you may agree there isn't anything particularly wrong with
using it for this purpose. It just allows labeling messages in a way
that is efficient to search against.
>There seem to be quite a few users with this issue. Do you think a
>boolean option like "crypt_verify_smime" that explicitly works even
>with GPGME would be feasible? From a user POV, it sure sounds logical
>and useful.
Yes, that may be possible although it might be better to then deprecate
$crypt_verify_sig and just have the separate pgp and smime config vars
(which should be quadoptions). It certainly wouldn't go in a stable
release.
>Also, is there a way to shorten the time that SMIME signature
>verification needs before timing out? 25 seconds sounds much too long
>to me.
I don't know what it's doing that takes so long to time out, and have no
idea how to adjust that. Maybe others who use s/mime with GPGME have
ideas.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/attachments/20230730/00ceff62/attachment-0001.asc>
More information about the Mutt-users
mailing list