Is there any way to view text/html inline *only if* we think text/plain is not right?
Cameron Simpson
cs at cskk.id.au
Sun May 21 23:36:07 UTC 2023
On 18May2023 19:53, José María Mateos <chema at rinzewind.org> wrote:
>Lately I've been receiving mail in which the text/plain part and the
>text/html part are at odds. This is typically caused by generator
>software that ignores text/plain, or uses some old version, etc.
Leaving aside the solutions mentioned, I keep a mutt group for senders
known to do the text/plain badly. My mutt setup has the following, which
preferes plain text but flips to html for people in my "htmlers" group
and a small collection of other conditions:
############################
# alternative-order criteria
message-hook . 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/plain text/html'
# Apple Mail embeds attachments in the HTML part instead of outside the multipart/mixed
message-hook '~h "X-Mailer: Apple Mail" ~X 1-' 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/html multipart/mixed text/plain'
# senders who can't seem to master multipart/mixed, and send empty
# or useless text/plain sections
# or just badly badly formatted plain text, such as live.com etc
message-hook '%f htmlers | ~f @no-reply at cc.yahoo-inc.com | ~f @outlook.com | ~f live.com | ~f @facebookmail.com' 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/html text/plain'
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs at cskk.id.au>
More information about the Mutt-users
mailing list