Fwd:
Kevin J. McCarthy
kevin at 8t8.us
Sat Oct 24 21:30:55 UTC 2020
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 04:15:24PM -0400, Remco Rijnders wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:49:12PM -0700, Kevin wrote in
><X5SFONzhMkALtYAO at afu.lan>:
>>I didn't see any options regarding the wrapper Subject header, so
>>I've changed the action to munge the From address instead.
>>
>>I originally shied away from this choice because it sets a reply-to
>>header; however it appears the wrapper option does too. So I guess
>>it's the lesser of two evils.
>
>Thanks Kevin! Let's hope this fixes it. Are these default options that
>mailman offers for handling these DMARC policies?
Yes, mailman's dmarc_moderation_action option has either "wrap" or
"munge_from", (in addition to the standard accept/reject/discard)
options.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/attachments/20201024/5a81439c/attachment.asc>
More information about the Mutt-users
mailing list