Inline PGP Within HTML
David Engel
david at istwok.net
Sun Apr 26 18:18:52 UTC 2020
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:59:43AM +0200, Jens John wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > IT guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly
> > handle encypted emails.
>
> Outlook has pretty comprehensive, native support for encrypting and
> signing with S/MIME. Perhaps your IT guy would be more open to just
> using a well-documented Outlook feature? As mutt has support for S/MIME
> too, this might be much more workable than insisting on PGP.
I've suggested that before. A few of us even had to use S/MIME for a
while when a customer required us to. Basically, it boils down to
inertia. PGP already works (for their definition of works) so why
change.
David
--
David Engel
david at istwok.net
More information about the Mutt-users
mailing list