Mbox locking, how to do it in a way that will work with mutt?
Erik Christiansen
dvalin at internode.on.net
Sat Jun 29 04:58:07 UTC 2019
On 28.06.19 21:22, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> I happen to know that procmail tries to lock the file in _all_ the ways
> available on the system, for instance on Linux with a dotlock temporary
> file, with flock, and with fcntl. This is a bit overkill but it means
> procmail is safe to use as long as the other program accessing the
> mailbox uses any locking at all.
And nine years ago, on 09.08.10 15:37, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:26:07PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > ....+USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK....
> >
> > but does that mean that to co-operate with mutt another process *has*
> > to use dotlock and fcntl? ... and, if so, what order should one do
> > things in?
>
> dotlock first, then fcntl. realize that these are just advisory locks,
> which means other processes might not obey them. mutt is conservative and
> uses multiple methods since there is no standard.
>
> me
So, looking from the other side also, it appears that both are respected.
Erik
More information about the Mutt-users
mailing list