Continually asked "Enter keyID"
Farhan Khan
farhan at farhan.codes
Sun Mar 17 07:36:59 UTC 2019
On 19-03-17 11:40 AM, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 11:12:22PM -0400, Farhan Khan wrote:
> > On 19-03-17 11:02 AM, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>
> > > What does `gpg --list-keys --list-options show-usage` show for the
> > > key? Is the encryption flag [E] present?
>
> > Yes, one of the subkeys is listed with [E].
> >
> > pub rsa2048 2017-09-10 [SC] [expires: 2019-09-10]
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> > uid [ultimate] Username <user at domain>
> > sub rsa2048 2017-09-10 [E] [expires: 2019-09-10]
> >
> > Notice that its listed as ultimate. This is only because it used to be
> > my key before switching emails, so I specifically changed the trust.
>
> Please reply to the list, not me personally, so that others can contribute.
> I've redirected my reply back to the list.
>
> Off the top of my head, I'm not sure what the problem is. Perhaps try the
> classic gpg interface instead (turn off $crypt_use_gpgme and source the
> sample gpg.rc that comes with mutt).
>
> Alternatively, check the output of
> gpg --no-verbose --batch --quiet --with-colons --with-fingerprint --with-fingerprint --list-keys <keyid>
>
> I don't think gpg --list-keys would include disabled keys, but perhaps one
> of the flags in that output will make things clearer.
>
> --
> Kevin J. McCarthy
> GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
I have searched all over Google/Duck with no luck. However, a lot of people are reporting the same issue.
I suspect this is a bug in Mutt.
---
Farhan Khan
PGP Fingerprint: 1312 89CE 663E 1EB2 179C 1C83 C41D 2281 F8DA C0DE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/attachments/20190317/bcdca862/attachment-0001.asc>
More information about the Mutt-users
mailing list