[Mutt] Re: Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

[Kevin J. McCarthy]

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 05:56:51PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
>The majority of the community said nothing at all, which suggests (as 
>I suggested) that most people don't actually give a $#@! about this, 
>as well they shouldn't.

I'm pretty happy with the turnout.  I've re-read the discussion and 
arguments, and I appreciate everyone's time to voice their opinion.

In the end, I still believe both modes have merit depending upon the 
situation.  The default most certainly won't change, but I do plan on 
adding a new function.

>But FWIW Kevin isn't the only one with his sleeves rolled up--there are 
>other maintainers, and beyond that there are other contributors, myself 
>included, albeit infrequently.

Vincent is the only other semi-active team member.  Patches have been 
ticking up since the move to gitlab, but let's be honest, if I stepped 
away things would grind to a halt.  I don't do this full time, so 
development moves at the pace I can sustain, which is somewhat slow.

Other maintainers to share the load would be a good thing for the 
project.  For those who share the culture and goals of Mutt, please 
consider that a "help wanted" sign.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/attachments/20181214/e4413590/attachment.asc>