Bottom posting v top posting

[Stephan Seitz]

On Di, Mai 15, 2018 at 01:37:06 +0100, tech-lists wrote:
>But inline quoting has its own issues. Multiple inline quotes from 
>multiple messages can get messy. IMOHO messier than just bottom posting, 
>which is at least logically chronological.

Bottom posting is as bad as top posting. There isn’t much difference.  
Bigger mail with several questions is difficult to answer with both 
methods. In most cases some questions are missed or the recipient doesn’t 
know to which question the answer belongs.

Inline quoting is the only good method. It forces the writer to think 
about his answers and the correct placement so that the recipient doesn’t 
have trouble to understand the mail and this should be the most important 
thing.

Shade and sweet water!

	Stephan

-- 
| Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5140 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/attachments/20180515/a4afb1db/attachment.bin>