Mutt.pot file for 2.0 release
Kevin J. McCarthy
kevin at 8t8.us
Mon Oct 26 16:57:24 UTC 2020
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 09:21:41PM +0100, keld at keldix.com wrote:
>I am new here, but have translated much oss sw for about 20 years, including gnu tp, kde,
>gnome and various distros to danish, I wonder why we do not use some of this machinery,
>eg. gnu tp, this would do some things automagicly, such as merging old messages, statistics,
>version control and maybe access to more translators.
>
>Kevin says he is open to discuss this.
>
>so should we move to gnu tp?
Hi Everyone, and welcome Keld!
Keld emailed me offlist, but I encouraged him to email the list to get a
conversation going.
To be clear, I have no problems with the current organization of things.
I think you all are doing great, and everything works well (for me at
least).
However, I also have little experience with how other projects run their
translation. Keld asked if we had considered GNU tp, and my answer is
that no one had mentioned it.
If you have experience with GNU tp, or opinions about the way the
current process is run (positive or negative), please don't hesitate to
chime in.
Also, this obviously is about *future* possibilities. Let's keep the
2.0 release as usual - on the mutt-po list or GitLab Merge Request.
Thank you all,
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-po/attachments/20201026/d0e9023a/attachment.asc>
More information about the Mutt-po
mailing list