order of sending mail and saving to fcc

[Nicolas Rachinsky]

* Francesco Ariis <fa-ml at ariis.it> [2019-06-04 19:52 +0200]:
> Hello Grant,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 04:46:50PM -0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2019-06-04, Jack M <jack at forallx.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > The reason (or *a* reason) is that the old way led to the following
> > > situation: Fcc first, then try to send, something weird happens, but
> > > the user has no idea whether the mail was actually sent or not
> > 
> > How could the user not know? If the send fails, mutt prints an error
> > message and stays on the message compose screen.  It's pretty
> > obvious...
> 
> I have the bad habit of pressing 'q' (exit to menu) after sending.
> Also terminal corruption or similar events: you can't be sure whether
> the message was actually sent.

With the new order this behaviour might lead to a sent mail without
a local copy. If you miss the failure to send, you might as well
miss the failure to fcc.

HAND
Nicolas