Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients
dvalin at internode.on.net
Fri Nov 30 11:54:57 UTC 2018
On 30.11.18 01:34, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:41:12PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > I am curious to know in what context "someone" felt it would make a
> > difference.
> I suspect work related setting. Cc: is indeed "being kept in the loop"
> while To: is "addressed specifically".
> I have never noticed mutt behaviour, but the above seems a sensible
Spontaneous increase of entropy isn't usually user-friendly. If I hadn't
retired ten years ago, it'd make more of a difference here, but letting
the CC list know they can leave the message on the back burner is
fractionally as important as signalling the TO recipients that they
More information about the Mutt-users