Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

Erik Christiansen dvalin at
Fri Nov 30 11:54:57 UTC 2018

On 30.11.18 01:34, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:41:12PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > I am curious to know in what context "someone" felt it would make a
> > difference.
> I suspect work related setting. Cc: is indeed "being kept in the loop"
> while To: is "addressed specifically".
> I have never noticed mutt behaviour, but the above seems a sensible
> behaviour.


Spontaneous increase of entropy isn't usually user-friendly. If I hadn't
retired ten years ago, it'd make more of a difference here, but letting
the CC list know they can leave the message on the back burner is
fractionally as important as signalling the TO recipients that they


More information about the Mutt-users mailing list