Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients
itz at very.loosely.org
Thu Nov 29 23:41:12 UTC 2018
On 2018-11-29 13:26, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Someone opened a ticket asking about Mutt's group reply behavior.
> By default (i.e. ignoring Mail-Followup-To, $reply_self, $reply_to,
> etc.), the To recipients are added to the Cc list of the reply. The
> ticket reporter thought it made more sense for To recipients to remain
> in the To list of the reply. Apparently, Thunderbird does this, but
> not sure about other clients.
> Have no fear, I have no intention of changing default behavior. But
> I'm curious about opinions on this list. Is this "established proper"
> behavior, or is this something reasonable to have an option for?
I am curious to know in what context "someone" felt it would make a
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
More information about the Mutt-users