potentially incorrect conversion of pointer to unsigned long

[Kevin J. McCarthy]

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 07:19:41AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>IMHO, the best solution for safety would be to use a union (I think 
>>that this would require the use of C99 designators for the MuttVars 
>>initialization).
>
>Okay, I will work on this.  I think it's better to fix this the right 
>way now then get bitten by this later.

I've pushed up a couple commits to the kevin/muttvar-rework branch.

If there are no objections, I will continue the same basic work with the 
Commands[] array too.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-dev/attachments/20190624/6b83e08f/attachment.asc>