safe_rename() and verifying the result of link(2)

Vincent Lefevre vincent at vinc17.org
Fri Aug 3 05:57:48 UTC 2018


On 2018-07-26 18:39:30 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> My question is about the merit of performing the lstat double-check.
> Does mutt need to be doing this?  Does this work around some strange bug
> with certain filesystems or NFS?

sshfs has bugs by default. When I use it, I need the -o workaround=rename
option, otherwise some operations fail (I don't remember what exactly).
Has this been tried here, with Mutt?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent at vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)


More information about the Mutt-dev mailing list